← Writing archive

Essay · Autistic experience

The world is louder, brighter, and more overwhelming than you know.

Drawing on research from Daniel, Mahler, Ray, Sharp, Clairy, Inderbitzen, Laurent, Fede, and Delafield‑Butt — “Sensory‑Processing Informed Autism Practice for Child‑Centered Therapists” — and the Autism Goggles framework by Daniel Share‑Strom and Maxine Share.

Essay May 2026 ~8 min read

When a young autistic adult walks into a room and immediately seems distracted, unsettled, or withdrawn — before a single word has been exchanged — something has often already happened.

The fluorescent lights are humming at a frequency that lands like a physical pressure. The smell from the kitchen down the hall is overwhelming. The chair fabric is scratching through their clothing. Someone's perfume arrived with them in the elevator and hasn't left. And underneath all of it, their nervous system is doing what it always does: processing an enormous amount of sensory information that most people around them aren't registering at all.

This is not metaphor. This is neuroscience. And it matters profoundly — for how we understand behavior, how we build relationships, and how we support autistic people in their daily lives.


Autism Is a Sensory Experience

Most conversations about autism focus on social communication. And that matters. But research increasingly points to something that many autistic people have been saying for years: the sensory experience of being autistic is foundational. It shapes everything else.

Autistic people don't just process sensory information differently in one or two ways. They can process it differently across all eight sensory systems — and understanding each of them changes how we read what we see.


The Eight Senses, and What They Mean in Practice

Most of us were taught five senses in school. There are eight. And for autistic people, any or all of them may be operating outside typical ranges — sometimes more sensitive, sometimes less, sometimes inconsistently between the two.

Sound. Research shows that for many autistic people, the experience of listening in a noisy environment is comparable to what a neurotypical person experiences trying to follow a conversation while someone shouts nearby — even when the environment seems ordinary to everyone else. Sounds above around 80 decibels (roughly the level of a loud restaurant or someone raising their voice) can be genuinely intolerable for many autistic people. High-pitched sounds at normal volumes can cause distress that's invisible to the people making them.

When someone covers their ears in a seemingly quiet room, they are not being dramatic. They are responding to something real.

Vision. Autistic visual processing tends toward the local rather than the global — meaning autistic people often perceive details with exceptional clarity and precision, but take longer to assemble those details into overall meaning or context. The texture of a wall. A particular flicker of light. The slight asymmetry in someone's expression. These register vividly, while the "big picture" of a scene takes more cognitive effort to construct.

This is part of why fluorescent lighting, busy visual environments, and rapidly shifting scenes can be genuinely exhausting rather than simply unappealing.

Taste and smell. Autistic individuals are often more sensitive to smell than non-autistic peers. Food aversions that appear to be about preference or behavior are frequently rooted in genuine gustatory sensitivity — specific textures, flavors, or food combinations that provoke real distress, not stubbornness. This is also relevant to dental care, mealtimes, and any environment where smells are strong or unpredictable.

Touch. The range of tactile experience in autistic people is wide. Some are hypersensitive — clothing tags feel unbearable, unexpected physical contact is jarring, certain textures on furniture or floors are genuinely aversive. Some are hyposensitive, meaning they seek out additional tactile input — bumping, pressing, squeezing, weighted pressure — as a way of regulating their nervous system. Neither is a behavioral problem. Both are sensory needs.

This is why what looks like repetitive or unusual physical behavior is often the person doing exactly what their nervous system is asking for.

Balance and movement (vestibular sense). For some autistic people, stillness is disorienting — it can feel like vertigo. Slight rocking or movement provides a sense of orientation and calm. For others, certain movements are frightening precisely because their vestibular system doesn't reliably tell them where they are in space. Activities that invert the head, for instance, are organizing for some autistic people and terrifying for others. You cannot know which until you ask or observe carefully.

Body position (proprioception). Proprioception is the sense of where your body is in space and how much force you're using. Autistic people who are hypersensitive here may prefer loose clothing and avoid tight contact. Those who are hyposensitive often seek out deep pressure — weighted blankets, tight squeezes, resistance activities — because their nervous system isn't getting the feedback it needs from ordinary movement.

Internal body signals (interoception). This is the one that may matter most for the kind of work I do in my practice, and the one that is least discussed.

Interoception is the sense of what's happening inside your body — hunger, thirst, fatigue, pain, the physical feeling of emotions. For many autistic people, this sense is disrupted. It can be muted, meaning the person doesn't notice body signals until they reach a critical point. It can be intense, meaning minor sensations register as overwhelming. And it can be inconsistent — fluctuating between the two depending on stress levels, environment, and how much the nervous system is already managing.

The implications of this are significant and far-reaching.


When You Can't Feel What Your Body Is Telling You

Imagine not reliably knowing when you're hungry until you're in physical pain from it. Not recognizing that you're exhausted until you collapse. Not noticing that you're anxious until your body is already in full fight-or-flight — and then being blindsided by the intensity of your own reaction.

This is the reality for many autistic people with interoceptive disruption.

In my earlier writing about executive function and the AEFAM framework, we described how dysregulation — the state of a nervous system that has exceeded its capacity — is a primary driver of the challenges autistic young adults face in daily life. Interoception is the missing piece of that puzzle. When a person can't reliably read their own internal signals, they miss the early warnings. By the time the dysregulation is visible on the outside, it has often been building invisibly for hours.

This is why a meltdown can appear to come from nowhere. It didn't. The signals were there — they just weren't accessible.

It's also why basic self-care is so much harder than it looks. Eating regularly, drinking enough water, sleeping when tired, stopping before you're depleted — all of these require reliable access to internal body signals that many autistic people simply don't have in the way neurotypical people do.


The Connection to Social Injuries and Rejection

There's a thread that runs through all of this that connects directly to earlier posts on social injuries and Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria.

When the sensory environment is consistently overwhelming — when every day requires managing a flood of input that other people don't seem to notice at all — the nervous system becomes depleted. Depleted nervous systems have less capacity for everything: emotional regulation, social processing, executive function, recovery from hard moments.

Every social injury, as we've written before, imprints. Every experience of shame, rejection, or misunderstanding adds to a cumulative load that the nervous system carries. For an autistic person who is simultaneously managing significant sensory demands, that load is heavier than most people around them can imagine.

This is why the reaction to a seemingly minor social moment can be so intense. It's not just about that moment. It's about a nervous system that has been working at capacity all day — managing sound, light, touch, smell, proprioceptive feedback, interoceptive confusion — and then encounters one more thing it has to process.

The emotional response isn't disproportionate to the total load. It just looks disproportionate when you can only see the last straw.


What I Do Differently Because of This

In my practice, sensory awareness isn't a specialty add-on. It's a baseline.

Before I think about goals, action steps, or accountability, I ask: what is this person's sensory environment like right now? What might they have navigated to get here? What is their nervous system currently managing that isn't visible in the room?

I pay attention to where someone chooses to sit. Whether they seem to need movement. Whether the environment I'm working in has features that might be adding load rather than reducing it. Whether the timing of a coaching session — mid-afternoon after a full day of sensory demands, for instance — might affect how much is possible in that hour.

When a client seems distracted or flat or reactive in a session, my first question is not about motivation or effort. It's about state. What is their nervous system doing right now, and what does it need before anything else can be useful?

This also shapes how we support clients in developing self-awareness. Helping someone learn to notice early signals in their own body — the small signs that dysregulation is building before it becomes a crisis — is some of the most important work I do. Not because we expect them to simply manage better, but because awareness creates choice. When you can catch the signal early, you have options. When you miss it entirely and get blindsided, you don't.


A Different Way of Seeing Behavior

In the Autism Goggles framework, the invitation is always to look through the lens of the autistic person's experience rather than evaluating behavior from the outside. Sensory processing is one of the most important things that lens reveals.

The person who won't eat in the work cafeteria isn't being difficult — the smell of the space may be genuinely intolerable. The person who wears the same clothing every day isn't careless about their appearance — they've found the items that don't cause constant tactile distraction. The person who rocks or fidgets during a conversation isn't disrespecting you — their vestibular system may be providing the orientation their body needs to stay present and engaged.

When I see these behaviors for what they are — sensory regulation, not social failure — I stop trying to extinguish them. I start asking what they're telling me, and how I can create conditions where the person doesn't have to work quite so hard just to be in the room.

That's what neurodiversity-affirming support actually looks like. Not tolerance of difference. Active adaptation to meet people where they are — in their actual sensory experience of the world, not the one we imagine they should be having.

This post draws on research from Daniel, Mahler, Ray, Sharp, Clairy, Inderbitzen, Laurent, Fede, and Delafield-Butt — "Sensory-Processing Informed Autism Practice for Child-Centered Therapists" — as well as the Autism Goggles framework developed by Daniel Share-Strom and Maxine Share. We are grateful to both for deepening the work I do.

Amee Hardy, LCPC, is a Licensed Clinical Professional Counselor in Idaho and the developer of the CSO Framework™. Her writing draws on twenty years of clinical practice with neurodivergent adolescents and adults.

Learn more at ameehardy.com.